Legal Opinion

Birchmore v. Upchurch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1948No. 32218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The verdict having been directed for the defendant, the evidence must be construed in its light most favorable to the plaintiff in order to determine if there is any to support a verdict for him. See McNabb v. Hardeman, 77 Ga. App. 451 (49 S. E. 2d, 194).

The testimony of the plaintiff alone makes a jury question upon all essential elements of a recovery for the real-estate broker’s commissions alleged to be due, provided the evidence as a whole does not preclude such recovery by reason of the offer to sell being conditioned upon a certain option by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. LynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Thompson v. FainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. McNabb v. HardemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Dolvin Realty Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hendrix, Waddell, Martin & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Morgan v. SiegalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Kinard Realty, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Krebs v. MorganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Harper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API