Legal Opinion

Howard v. Sills & Purvis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1922No. 3055PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1; Generally a broker’s commissions are earned when, during the agency, he • finds a purchaser ready, able, and willing to buy, and who actually offers to buy on the terms stipulated by the owner. Civil Code (1910), § 3587. An offer by the proposed purchaser to buy on terms not stipulated by the owner will not entitle the broker to his commissions.

2. As a general rule, where property is listed by an owner for sale through a real-estate broker at a stipulated price and commission, without anything being said as to terms of payment, the contract is to be construed as authority to the broker to…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weldon v. LashleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Atlanta Realty Co. v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. McNabb v. HardemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Waring v. John J. Thompson & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Turner v. Atlanta Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API