Legal Opinion
Hastie v. Handeland
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 1969No. Civ. 9339PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AULT, J. pro tem. *
Appellants, Antoinette Hastie and Marcia Hastie, are the widow and daughter respectively and the sole heirs at law of William L. Hastie. They brought this action for the wrongful death of William L. Hastie, claiming in the first cause of action that on May 25, 1962, the defendant Handeland, while in the employ of the defendant Raytheon Company, negligently drove and operated a Ford station wagon which collided with an automobile driven by Hastie proximately causing injuries which resulted in Hastie’s death on January 11, 1963. The second cause of action was directed against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Blackwell v. American Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Maxwell v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Blecker v. WolbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Papastathis v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Henry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.