Legal Opinion

Papastathis v. Beall

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 22, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5702PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge the jury’s verdict in favor of appellees in a wrongful death action and the court’s denial of their motions for new trial, judgment n.o.v. and remittitur. We find the record supports the verdict and affirm.

On September 2,1981, Peter Papastathis, decedent, was in appellant Walter Beall’s (Beall) “7-11” store in Phoenix, Arizona. The franchisor, “owner and lessor” of the property is appellant Southland Corporation (Southland). Upon entering the store, Mr. Papastathis went to a cooler and bent down to make a selection. At the same time, Bobby Gene…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Heinrich v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  5. Reese v. CraditCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Whitten v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Professional Sports, Inc. v. Gillette Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Bland v. IMCO Recycling, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API