Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Light

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 1.] This is disciplinary proceeding against an attorney who improperly managed a trust account and changed a contingency fee agreement without properly advising his client on the effect of that change. We conclude that a public censure is the appropriate discipline for both violations.

Background

[¶2.] Charles E. Light, Jr., graduated from the University of South Dakota School of Law in 1959. He was admitted to practice law in this state on August 13, 1959. He has also been admitted in Nebraska. After his graduation from law school, he served as a law clerk for Federal District Court Judge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Discipline of DanaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Matter of Discipline of JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re the Discipline of ClaggettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LaprathSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re the Discipline of EicherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re the Discipline of MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of RokahrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Matter of Discipline of RussellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API