Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Russell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2011No. 25490PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

' [¶ 1.] This is a disciplinary proceeding against Lance Russell, a member of the State Bar of South Dakota. The Disciplinary Board of the State Bar recommended that Russell be publicly censured. The Referee, Retired Justice Robert A. Miller, also recommended a public censure. In his brief in response to the Referee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation, Russell asks this Court to dismiss the Board’s and the Referee’s recommendation. At oral argument, however, Russell’s counsel told the Court that a “private censure” with conditions imposed to ensure…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Pierre v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Real Estate CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re the Formal Inquiry Concerning FullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re the Discipline of TornowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Discipline of VoleskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Discipline of VoleskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API