Legal Opinion
Simaan v. Veneman
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided December 17, 2004No. 1:03CV01153PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
TILLEY, District Judge.
On October 4, 2004, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No objections were received by the court within the time prescribed by the statute.
The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Pleading No. 7) be GRANTED and that this action be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice.
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SHARP, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Gould ex rel. Gould v. U.S. Deparment of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chesterfield Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
- Akpala v. United States Dept of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019