Cato v. Alcoa-Reynolds Metals Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
LINDER, J. pro tempore
Petitioners seek judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board decision involving the accepted claim of a deceased worker, Willard Sworden. Petitioner Linda Cato, who cohabited with but was not married to Sworden, asserts that she is entitled to statutory survivor benefits. Petitioner Scott Sworden, in his capacity as the personal representative of Willard Sworden’s estate, seeks to challenge employer’s acceptance of the claim. The board affirmed the dismissal of Cato’s hearing request, concluding that she is not a statutory beneficiary because she does not have an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Edwards v. Cherry City Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sather v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Sather v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Dancingbear v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Sather v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court · 2015