Legal Opinion

Sather v. Saif Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2015No. Agency 10-01494; CA A149547; SC S062466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

The question before us in this workers’ compensation case is whether, under ORS 656.218(3) and (5), 1 claimant’s estate is authorized to pursue a request for hearing seeking an award of permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits that claimant filed before his death, when the cause of his death was unrelated to the work injury. The Court of Appeals held that claimant’s estate, through his personal representative, was not authorized to pursue the claim to final determination under ORS 656.218 (3) on the grounds that (1) the estate is not one of the “persons” described in ORS 656.218(5), and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KurtzOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bergmann v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Schmidt v. Mt. Angel AbbeyOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lewis v. CIGNA InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Sather v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Brown v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Sather v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Sedgwick Claims Management Services v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API