Legal Opinion

Dancingbear v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 2021No. A167743Published

1Opinion of the Court

538 Argued and submitted December 2, 2019, reversed and remanded September 15, 2021 In the Matter of the Compensation of Mekayla N. Dancingbear, Claimant. Mekayla N. DANCINGBEAR, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Alternative Services Oregon, Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1604039; A167743

500 P3d 22

Claimant’s attorney established in a reconsideration proceeding under ORS 656.268 that claimant was entitled to more temporary disability benefits than SAIF Corporation, employer’s insurer, had provided for when it closed her claim. An administrative law judge (ALJ) concluded that,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. White v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Caren v. Providence Health Sys. Or. (In re Caren)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API