Legal Opinion

Earle M. Jorgensen Co. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1983No. 47986-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*863Utter, J.

This is a challenge of Seattle's 1980 adoption of an electrical rate increase. We reject appellants' various constitutional and statutory claims and affirm the trial court's order of summary judgment.

Appellants sought to set aside the electrical rates set by respondent City of Seattle (City) on July 21, 1980. Appellants are 19 industrial companies and one individual who purchase electricity from the City, located both within and without the Seattle city limits. The new rates increased the cost of electricity to 15 of the appellants by an average 88 percent.

In May 1978, the City,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Allan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Catlin v. Washington Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. 1000 Friends of Washington v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API