Legal Opinion
Premera v. Kreidler
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 4, 2006No. 32377-0-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1 Premera, Premera Blue Cross, and their affiliated companies (collectively Premera), sought to reorganize Premera’s holding company system under a for-profit parent and to convert the nonprofit affiliates to for-profit companies. Washington State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler (Commissioner) disapproved Premera’s proposal. Premera now seeks judicial *29review of the Commissioner’s ruling, arguing that: (1) he improperly interpreted the health carrier holding company act (Health Carrier HCA), (2) he erred by considering Premera’s proposal under the Insurer Holding Company Act (Insurer…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chandler v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Association v. CityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Yakima Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Chandler v. State, Office of Ins. Com'rCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Premera v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.