Legal Opinion

United States v. Techno Fund, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 27, 1967No. Civ. A. 8026PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion:

Branch A: To dismiss the Complaint because the United States is not the real party in interest; or in the alternative,

Branch B: To dismiss the Complaint for lack of an indispensable party— the Administrator of the Small Busi*84ness Administration [hereinafter designated as SBA] — or in the alternative,

Branch C: To make the Administrator of the Small Business Administration a party plaintiff so that defendant may assert a counterclaim against him.

The motion has been considered on the memorandum in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Small Business Administration v. McClellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. Mel's Lockers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. Waylyn Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. W.R. Grace & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Certain Lots in Virginia BeachDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  3. United States v. Miami UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  4. Mountain States Sports, Inc. v. SharmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1972
  5. A.L. Williams & Associates, Inc. v. D.R. Richardson & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API