United States v. Techno Fund, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion:
Branch A: To dismiss the Complaint because the United States is not the real party in interest; or in the alternative,
Branch B: To dismiss the Complaint for lack of an indispensable party— the Administrator of the Small Busi*84ness Administration [hereinafter designated as SBA] — or in the alternative,
Branch C: To make the Administrator of the Small Business Administration a party plaintiff so that defendant may assert a counterclaim against him.
The motion has been considered on the memorandum in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Small Business Administration v. McClellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Mel's Lockers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Insurance Co. of North America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Waylyn Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- United States v. Certain Lots in Virginia BeachDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- United States v. Miami UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Mountain States Sports, Inc. v. SharmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1972
- A.L. Williams & Associates, Inc. v. D.R. Richardson & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.