Legal Opinion

Pelinski v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 27, 1980No. 79 C 2729PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Stephen Pelinski (“Pelinski”) and Pamela Pelinski brought this diversity-based personal injury action against Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”), owner of the Norfolk, Nebraska premises on which the alleged injury occurred, and Behlen Manufacturing Company (“Behlen”), general contractor for construction of a plant on Goodyear’s property. In turn, Goodyear and Behlen filed third party complaints against Spacemark, Inc. (“Spacemark”), Pelinski’s employer and Behlen’s subcontractor.

Spacemark has moved (1) “to dismiss for lack of cause…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. Brinkerhoff-Signal Drilling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nalco Co. v. Environmental Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Williams v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Novco v. GraingerMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Novco v. GraingerMontana Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API