Legal Opinion

In Re David S.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 22, 2002No. 2, Sept.Term, 2001PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This case involves a stop and frisk, governed by the teachings of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and its progeny. We granted the State’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to determine whether cocaine taken from the person of David S. was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. In making this determination, we must decide whether the police had a reasonable basis to believe that David S. was armed, and, if they did, whether the seizure of David S. was tantamount to an arrest requiring probable cause.

On April…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Nathan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API