Bloedel Donovan Lumber Mills v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Justice
Plaintiff and defendant entered into two written contracts in the spring of 1940. The contracts provided that plaintiff should cut and remove certain growing timber and pay *742for same at specified prices. One of tlie contracts covered an area of about 14 acres and the other about 80 acres.
The sale contracts contained provisions, recited in our finding 6, requiring the plantiff to burn such of the slash resulting from the cutting of the timber as the forest supervisor might require, at such times and in such manner as the forest officer in charge might specify. They also required plaintiff to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910
- Heil v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968