Legal Opinion

Todd Greenberg v. Target Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2021No. 19-16699PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TODD GREENBERG, On Behalf of No. 19-16699 Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:17-cv-01862- RS v. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota OPINION Corporation; INTERNATIONAL VITAMIN CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation; PERRIGO COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 16, 2020 Pasadena, California Filed January 13, 2021 2…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James Kroessler v. Cvs Health CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Paul Dachauer v. Nbty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Michiko Gingery v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Judith Badgley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ferrari v. Vitamin Shoppe Industries LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. Amado v. The Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Broussard v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Dervin v. Nature's Bounty, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Ferrari v. Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API