Legal Opinion
Amado v. The Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 8, 2023No. 3:22-cv-05427Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TARA AMADO, Case No. 22-cv-05427-MMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; AFFORDING 10 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is defendant Proctor & Gamble Co.’s (“P&G”) motion, filed March 14 10, 2023, “to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint.” Plaintiffs Tara Amado and Regina 15 Pellegrino have filed opposition, to which P&G has replied. Having read and considered 16 the papers filed in support of and in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.