Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Crittenden County, Ark.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1922No. 2102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

This is an action praying for a decree against the county for $120,872.50 due on unpaid county warrants or scrip issued by the defendant for the construction of a bridge by the assignors of the plaintiff. The prayer of the complaint is that the judgment be declared a hen on the bridge, and, if the amount awarded is not paid within a time specified, that the Hen be foreclosed. The plaintiff and the county, the latter acting by its county judge and attorneys, filed a stipulation and presented a form of a decree granting the plaintiff a judgment for the amount claimed and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Schooner Hoppet & Cargo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  5. Kelley v. MilanSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Filbert v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway Dist.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1924
  2. Village of Hartford v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Arkansas ex rel. Switzer v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API