Legal Opinion

Vannoy v. . Stafford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This was an action against the endorser of a note and was resisted on the ground of release by an extension of the time for payment. On the face of the note appears the following: “Protest, presentment, notice of dishonor, and extension of time of payment waived by all parties to this note.”

These words constituted a waiver by defendant’s intestate, who was a “party” to the note as an endorser. c. S., 3092; Bank v. Hessee, 207 N. C., 71; Corp. Com. v. Wilkinson, 201 N. C., 344.

Defendant also excepted to the testimony of an attorney, who had formerly held the note for collection, as to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Corporation Commission v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Jones v. . EmorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Fidelity Bank v. HesseeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Burton v. . StyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Sanderson v. PaulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Cities Serv. Oil Co. v. HOWELL OIL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Sanderson v. PaulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API