Legal Opinion
Royster v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided March 28, 2005No. 1:03 CV 000579PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
BEATY, District Judge.
On September 3, 2004, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Document #24] was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff filed timely Objections. The Court has now reviewed the Objections and the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made, and the Court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Document # 24] is therefore affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PBM Graphics Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Casim Noble v. Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions, Inc., et al.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026
- Innocenti v. WakeMedDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019