Legal Opinion

State v. Stuart

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1987No. 16063PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Mary Stuart appeals her conviction for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. The sole issue she raises is whether there was good cause for scheduling her trial beyond the six-month limitation period of I.C. § 19-3501. We reverse the judgment of conviction.

On May 8, 1984, the state filed its information against Stuart and two co-defendants. A pretrial motion hearing was held on June 14, 1984, in which the following took place. An attorney from the public defender’s office, who represented all three defendants, stated that he would be pursuing, under I.C. § 19-815A,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. State v. ThurlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HigginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. NaccaratoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. CarmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. BeckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API