Legal Opinion

State v. Naccarato

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1994No. 20533PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Larry Naccarato entered a conditional plea of guilty before the magistrate, pursuant to I.C.R. 11(a)(2), to a charge of .driving under the influence. I.C. § 18-8004. He appealed from his judgment of conviction, having reserved the right to contest the magistrate’s denial of his motion to suppress and the denial of his motion to dismiss. He now appeals from the order of the district court affirming the magistrate’s rulings on the two motions.

On appeal, Naccarato asserts that the traffic stop was not based upon a reasonable and articulable suspicion and, as a result, the evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. RushoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. FlowersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. McCarthyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API