Legal Opinion
Searcy v. Simmons
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 13, 1999No. Civil Action 97-3421-KHVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights by reducing his inmate incentive level after he refused to enter into a recommended rehabilitation program at Hutchinson Correctional Facility. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs “[Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Temporary Restraining Order ]” (Doc. # 48) filed September 14, 1998, 1 and plaintiffs Motion For Leave To File Reply Out Of Time (Doc. # 98) filed June 25, 1999. For reasons stated more fully below, plaintiffs motion…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schnitzler v. ReischDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007
- Searcy v. SimmonsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Wares v. SimmonsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Ainsworth v. Edda Cantor CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000