Legal Opinion
Searcy v. Simmons
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 21, 2000No. CIV.A.97-3421-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights by reducing his inmate incentive level after he refused to enter into a sex abuse rehabilitation program at Hutchinson Correctional Facility. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or In The Alternative Judgment on The Pleadings (Doc. # 135) and Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 138), both filed November 5, 1999. For reasons stated below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is sustained and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Searcy v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Lile v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000