Legal Opinion

Wachter Development, Inc. v. Martin

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2019No. 20180379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶1] Andrea and Kevin Martin appeal a district court judgment ordering the removal of a fence on their property after finding the fence violated restrictive covenants recorded against the property. The Martins argue the restrictive covenants do not apply to their property because they agreed to purchase the property before the covenants went into effect. They also claim the restrictive covenants are unconscionable. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Wachter Development has an interest in the Promontory Point V development in Bismarck. In April 2012, Wachter entered into a purchase contract with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pfeifle v. TanabeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Green v. GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wheeler v. Southport Seven Planned Unit DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of SandeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Estate of SandeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Woodrock v. McKenzie Cty.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Carpenter v. Southbay Homeowners AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. MAHER v. NORTHLAND GROUP INCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API