Wachter Development, Inc. v. Martin
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEvers, Justice.
[¶1] Andrea and Kevin Martin appeal a district court judgment ordering the removal of a fence on their property after finding the fence violated restrictive covenants recorded against the property. The Martins argue the restrictive covenants do not apply to their property because they agreed to purchase the property before the covenants went into effect. They also claim the restrictive covenants are unconscionable. We affirm.
I
[¶2] Wachter Development has an interest in the Promontory Point V development in Bismarck. In April 2012, Wachter entered into a purchase contract with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Pfeifle v. TanabeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Green v. GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Wheeler v. Southport Seven Planned Unit DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of SandeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Estate of SandeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Woodrock v. McKenzie Cty.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Carpenter v. Southbay Homeowners AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- MAHER v. NORTHLAND GROUP INCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020