Legal Opinion

Pfeifle v. Tanabe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2000No. 20000134PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Leslie Pfeifle appeals from the judgment of the district court determining Dr. Curtis Tanabe did not breach a five-year lease but justifiably terminated the lease and vacated the premises, based on Pfeifle’s failure to secure quiet possession of the premises within a reasonable time, and determining dental cabinets were trade fixtures lawfully removed. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In January 1993, Leslie Pfeifle entered a five-year lease agreement with Dr. Curtis Tanabe for rental of premises in connection with Tanabe’s purchase of the dental practice of Pfeifle’s late husband.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wachter v. Gratech Co., Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hanson v. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hofmann v. StollerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. R & D AMUSEMENT CORP. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. VND, LLC v. Leevers Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Executive Air Taxi Corp. v. City of Bismarck, NDCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lawrence v. DelkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API