Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stewart Honeybee Products, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1990No. 49 M.D. Appeal Docket 1989Published

1DissentLarsen, Justice

I dissent, and in support thereof I adopt the erudite opinion authored by President Judge James Crumlish, Jr. of the Commonwealth Court, and liberally quote therefrom as follows:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently refined the definition of manufacturing for purposes of capital stock tax exemption in Ski Roundtop, Inc. v. Commonwealth, *228520 Pa. 227, 553 A.2d 928 (1989). Manufacturing is “(1) the application of labor and skill (2) which changes a material (3) substantially (4) into a new, different and useful item.” Id., 520 Pa. at 231, 553 A.2d at 930.4

Applying that test to these…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Bindex Corp. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. Northern Elec. L. & P. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API