Legal Opinion

Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 28, 2000No. 99-1038PublishedCited by 484 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

A labor arbitrator ordered an employer to reinstate an employee truck driver who had twice tested positive for marijuana. The question before us is whether considerations of public policy require courts to refuse to enforce that arbitration award. We conclude that they do not. The courts may enforce the award. And the employer must reinstate, rather than discharge, the employee.

*60I

Petitioner, Eastern Associated Coal Corp., and respondent, United Mine Workers of America, are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement with arbitration provisions. The agreement specifies that, in arbitration, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. California Brewers Assn. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Exxon Corporation v. Esso Workers' Union, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by484 opinions

  1. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Baxter International, Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. SutterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

479 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API