Legal Opinion

Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2016No. 91357-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

Th~~pini~·ord at~l l~.''' .,/ ~2(; . .. •. 7 Ronald R. CarpentBr · Supreme Court Clark IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND NO. 91357-9 INDUSTRIES, Petitioner, ENBANC v. BART ROWLEY, SR., MAR ~ 7 2U16 Respondent. GORDON McCLOUD, J.-Bart Rowley Sr. was injured while driving a truck for his employer, and he subsequently filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits. The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) denied Rowley's claim because it determined that Rowley was injured while committing a felony: possession of a controlled substance. The…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API