Pfister v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The only question in this case is whether there is any evidence to warrant payment of workmen’s compensation.
Claimant testified that he entered the employ of the complying employer in April of 1935 when 18 years of age; that his disability “first developed like sort of a stiff back, but became worse as I worked, around in December 1935, seemed like I had a stiff back at the time”; that he first consulted a physician in March 1936; that he was compelled to leave his work for three days commencing August 22; that his work was changed to inventory clerk; and that he discontinued…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Drakulich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Goodman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Industrial Commission v. LambertOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Industrial Commission v. MinardOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Bearman v. Prudential Ins. Co. Of America. Bearman v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n. Bearman v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Brandt v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Bowling v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Galletti v. Burns InternationalOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.