Legal Opinion

Mary S. Riethmann Trust v. DIRECTOR OF REV.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 23, 2001No. SC 83324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN C. HOLSTEIN, Judge.

The trustees of the Mary S. Riethmann Trust and the personal representatives of Riethmann’s estate (the trust) request the reversal of a decision by the Administrative Hearing Commission in favor of the Missouri Director of Revenue (the director). The commission held that the trust owes over three million dollars in estate taxes, plus interest. The trust argues it cannot owe any Missouri estate tax because its federal estate tax liability is zero. Because this case involves the construction of a state revenue law, this Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction. Mo.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Hyde Park Housing Partnership v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. American Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. Murray v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Comptroller of the Treasury v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. American National Life Insurance Co. of Texas v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Brooker v. MadiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API