Legal Opinion
Murray v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided January 31, 2001No. SC 82849, SC 82779PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFF, Judge.
In these two cases the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission challenges the constitutionality of a 1999 statute that requires the commission to submit to arbitration when a plaintiff with a negligence claim against the commission requests arbitration. This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. Y, secs. 3 and 4. The cases are consolidated for purposes of this opinion. The statute is constitutional, and the orders to arbitrate that were issued in these cases are valid.
Facts
Brian K. Murray, Jr., et al., v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission
Michael Allen…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- City of Willow Springs v. Missouri State LibrarianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Winston v. REORGANIZED SCH. DIST. R-2, ETC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Fust v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Petition of Board of Public BuildingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ste. Genevieve School District R-II v. Board of Aldermen of Ste. GenevieveSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Independence-National Education Ass'n v. Independence School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Windermere Baptist Conference CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Lewis v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Reichert v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY ST. LOUISSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.