Legal Opinion

Lafferty v. Alan Wexler Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1990No. 00646PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The question presented in this case is under what circumstances a plaintiff should be permitted to amend her complaint to substitute a new defendant for the defendant named in the original complaint, once the statute of limitations has run. We find that the statute of limitations is tolled where a defendant actively conceals the identity of the party against whom a plaintiff intends to bring a cause of action. Accordingly, we reverse.

In her complaint filed on May 4, 1988, plaintiff-appellant, Linda Kitts Lafferty, alleged that she was injured on November 23, 1986 when a light…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Powell v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Weaver v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Ferraro v. McCarthy-PascuzzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Montanya v. McGonegalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Zercher v. Coca-Cola USASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API