Lafferty v. Alan Wexler Agency, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
The question presented in this case is under what circumstances a plaintiff should be permitted to amend her complaint to substitute a new defendant for the defendant named in the original complaint, once the statute of limitations has run. We find that the statute of limitations is tolled where a defendant actively conceals the identity of the party against whom a plaintiff intends to bring a cause of action. Accordingly, we reverse.
In her complaint filed on May 4, 1988, plaintiff-appellant, Linda Kitts Lafferty, alleged that she was injured on November 23, 1986 when a light…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Powell v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Weaver v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Ferraro v. McCarthy-PascuzzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Montanya v. McGonegalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Zercher v. Coca-Cola USASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.