Pollack v. City of Newark, NJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This case presents a most unusual situation in that both plaintiff and defendants filed motions for summary judgment under Rule 56(c), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.
On July 25, 1955, plaintiff, a citizen and resident of the State of New York, filed in this court a complaint against defendants who are the City of Newark, N. J., Frederick R. Lacey, the Chief of Police of the City, “John” Owens, a police lieutenant of the City, “and numerous other defendants whose names are unknown to plaintiff.” After eliminating the repetition and an irrelevant dissertation of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Earl v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Mascioli v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- First National Bank Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Travelodge Hotels, Inc. v. Honeysuckle Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.