Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Hill

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1928No. 4952PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff was a farm laborer employed by one Carlson. Defendant was the owner and operator of a bean-huller, and at the time this cause of action arose was operating his machine on the farm of said Carlson, threshing beans. Plaintiff was hauling the beans from the field to the threshing-machine. The machine had just been set, and threshing not begun, when plaintiff arrived at the machine with a load of beans, and drove his team and wagon up to the separator after the engine had started. Defendant signaled for the engine to be accelerated, and it was then discovered that the blower for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tinkle v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Froeming v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Burns v. GettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. French v. TebbenIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API