Moser v. Town of Phippsburg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
HORNBY, Justice.
We have consistently said that to overturn a real estate tax assessment, a taxpayer must show that the property was “substantially overvalued,” or that there was “unjust discrimination” in the apportionment of the tax burden, or that the assessment was “fraudulent, dishonest or illegal.” Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Town of Searsport, 438 A.2d 483, 484 (Me.1981); Shawmut Inn v. Town of Kennebunkport, 428 A.2d 384, 393 (Me.1981); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of Presque Isle, 150 Me. 181, 189, 107 A.2d 475, 479 (1954). Here, no issue is presented on the first or the third factors.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shawmut Inn v. Inhabitants of KennebunkportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Inhabitants of Presque IsleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Inhabitants of the Town of SearsportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Farrelly v. INHABITANTS OF THE TWN. OF DEER ISLESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Vienna v. KokernakSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Ram's Head Partners, LLC v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- City of Biddeford v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Town of MoscowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Donald Petrin v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.