Legal Opinion

Central Maine Power Co. v. Town of Moscow

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 26, 1994PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Central Maine Power Company (CMP) appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Crowley, J.) affirming a decision of the Board of Property Tax Review as to the property tax assessment imposed by the Town of Moscow for 1989 on a portion of CMP’s W.S. Wyman Hydroelectric Project (Wyman). On appeal, CMP contends that the Board improperly deferred to the municipal assessors and also erred by failing to take into account the effect of regulation by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) on Wyman’s fair market value. Discerning no error, we affirm the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  2. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Bernards TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  4. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Assessors of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Shawmut Inn v. Inhabitants of KennebunkportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weekley v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Glenridge Development Co. v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Quoddy Realty Corp. v. City of EastportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. IBM Credit Corp. v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Cassidy Holdings, LLC v. Aroostook County Commissioners et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API