Legal Opinion
City of Biddeford v. Adams
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 15, 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] The City of Biddeford appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Brennan, J.) affirming the decision of the State Board of Property Tax Review granting multiple taxpayers abatements on their 1993 and 1995 property taxes. Bidde-ford argues the Board erred in finding unjust discrimination in the assessment of the taxpayers’ taxes. Biddeford also contends that the abatements ordered by the Board are erroneous because they do not directly relate to the unjust discrimination. We affirm the decision of the Board.
[¶ 2] Patricia Adams and the other seventy-six plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Committee for Washington's Riverfront Parks v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- H.E. Sargent, Inc. v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Town of OaklandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- City of Waterville v. Waterville Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Chase v. Town of MacHiasportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adelman v. Town of BaldwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Forbes v. Town of Southwest HarborSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Ram's Head Partners, LLC v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Delogu v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Capodilupo v. Town of BristolSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.