Legal Opinion

Citsay v. Reich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1988No. 01783PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The Defendant-Appellant, Harry Reich, M.D., has filed this appeal from a trial court Order denying his Motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellant’s Motion was based upon the claim that the Plaintiff-Appellee, Deborah Citsay, instituted the instant medical malpractice action beyond the applicable two year statute of limitations. See the Act of July 9,1976, P.L. 586, No. 142, § 2, as amended by the Act of December 20, 1982, P.L. 1409, No. 326, art. II, § 201, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5524(2). The trial court certified its Order denying summary judgment as one involving a controlling…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kingston Coal Co. v. Felton Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. E.J.M. v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Baily v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Holmes v. LadoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API