Kehr Will
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne:
I am unable to join in the majority opinion. The single question involved is whether or not a notation on an unexecuted, altered, carbon copy of a probated will constitutes a revocation of the will under the provisions of the statute. The majority hold that it does. I am of the contrary view.
At the inception it is to be borne in mind that the privilege of disposing of an estate by will or through inheritance is not a natural or a constitutional right but exists solely by grace of the sovereign: Strode v. Commonwealth, 52 Pa. 181; Maginn’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Burtt WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Lockhart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of AkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Maginn's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.