Muhlhauser v. Becker
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion
The respondents set forth two general grounds. The first deals with the holding as to the jurisdiction of the district court to determine the issue involved in the appeal from the order of the county court.
With reference to this it is sufficient to say the petition practically amounts to "a restatement or reargument of matters contained" in their brief and thus already decided. This matter was presented fully and argued strenuously. Under rule 16 such matter cannot be made a basis for rehearing.
The second point involves "the law of the case"; the claim being this was settled in Borner v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Borner v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Bryson v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Wittmayer v. Security State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Hudson v. RileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.