Legal Opinion

Del Castillo v. Harbour

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 19, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brings this appeal to review a decision of the trial court setting aside a default judgment obtained by appellant.

The relative rights and liabilities of the parties have been the subject of lengthy controversy and several legal proceedings. In May of 1966, appellant alleging fraud with particularity, brought this action' against appellees and others for actual, “general” and punitive damages in a large amount. Defendants designated in the complaint and summons were:

“Ray Harbour, dba Ray Harbour’s Engine & Transmission Rebuilders, Rose Margaret…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hoffman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Exhibition Company v. MarxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Air East, Inc. v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Civil Service Employees Insurance Co. v. StichtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Town of Cottonwood v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Meinhard-Commercial Corp. v. Oxford Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API