Legal Opinion

National Exhibition Company v. Marx

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 8, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 703PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

Appellant, garnishee-defendant in the court below, seeks to set aside a default judgment entered on a writ of garnishment issued on behalf of appellee, plaintiff in the original action. The legal question involved is whether service of a writ of garnishment upon a hotel bookkeeper or “payroll master” is effective service upon its foreign corporate owner.

It is appellant’s contention that a bookkeeper is not a proper person upon whom service of process could be made pursuant to the terms of Rule 4(d), par. 6, of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. With the exception of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schering Corporation v. CotlowArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Tiller v. TillerArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fay v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Blech v. BlechCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Air East, Inc. v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Civil Service Employees Insurance Co. v. StichtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Town of Cottonwood v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Meinhard-Commercial Corp. v. Oxford Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API