Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1981No. 2617PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRANAHAN, Judge:

Defendant, Joseph Carey, has been convicted of criminal solicitation. 1 The evidence offered by the Commonwealth would indicate that the defendant solicited James Parsells, Owen Gallagher and David Eagan to set fire to Ernesto’s Little Italian Market in Clifton Heights, Delaware County, Pennsylvania.

During the trial, David Eagan testified that he attended meetings with James Parsells and Joseph Carey at which time the arson of Ernesto’s Little Italian Market was discussed and the defendant eventually paid to Eagan, who subsequently split the money with Parsells and Gallagher,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. CartagenaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. GreeneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HanibleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API