Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Hanible
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 19, 2011PublishedCited by 272 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice BAER.
In this capital case, Ronald Hanible (“Appellant”) appeals from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (“PCRA court”), which denied without a hearing all guilt phase claims raised in his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546.1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The facts underlying Appellant’s two murder convictions are fully set forth in our opinion affirming his judgment of sentence on direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Hanible, 575 Pa. 255, 836 A.2d 36 (2003). We reiterate those facts necessary…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by272 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Treiber, S., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BusanetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.