Legal Opinion
Quinones v. Potter
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 30, 2009No. Case CV 06-2366-PHX-MHMPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is Defendant John E. Potter’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. # 49). After reviewing the pleadings and determining that oral argument is unnecessary, the Court issues the following order.
I. BACKGROUND
In November 1995, the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”) hired Patricia Quinones (“Plaintiff’) as a mail processing clerk in the Phoenix General Mail Facility (“Phoenix GMF”). (Plaintiffs Controverting Statement of Facts (“PCSOF”) ¶¶1, 83-85; Defendant’s Objections to PCSOF (“DO”), Exh. A, p. 3). Mail processing…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Maner v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Reese v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMSDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Adkinson v. Phoenix Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Bessler v. Tempe, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.