Legal Opinion

Reese v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 3, 2010No. CIV. S-08-1703 FCD GGHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Barton Healthcare Systems’ (“defendant” or “Barton”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Susan Reese (“plaintiff’ or “Reese”) opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, 1 defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

BACKGROUND 2

Plaintiff Reese began working at defendant Barton in 1997 as a lab assistant. (UF ¶ 1.) She subsequently became a cardiac sonographer (“echo technician”). (UF ¶ 1.) As an echo technician,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erhart v. BofI Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Bailey v. Mount Diablo Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. Barstad v. Mid States IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Bryant v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Fitzgerald v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API