Legal Opinion

In re Assessment of Taxes, Estate of Bishop

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Tax Appeal Court, Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

This is an appeal hy the Tax Assessor from the assessments made by the Tax Appeal Court of two pieces of land belonging to the Bishop estate.

The first is a lot fronting on Union Square in Honolulu, containing 8,350 square feet. Its dimensions are 90 feet on King street, 79.8 on Richards street, 94.5 on Merchant street, and 106 in the rear. It was returned at $30,000, assessed by the present assessor’s predecessor in office at $80,000, admitted by the present assessor to be of the fair value of not over $50,000 and valued by the Tax Appeal Court at $30,000.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chilton v. ShawHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sharpe, Treasurer v. EngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Parker v. ShawHawaii Supreme Court · 1894
  4. New Canaan v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Taxes Onomea Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wilder v. ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In re Assessment of Taxes Oahu Railway & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In re the Taxes of CarterHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
  5. In re Assessment of Taxes, Lam Wo SingHawaii Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API