Legal Opinion

In re Assessment of Taxes, Lam Wo Sing

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Tax Appeal Court, Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

*61OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The taxpayer returned bis rice plantation at Waikiki as separate items: real property in fee, consisting of many small pieces, $14,332; leasehold interests in many small pieces of land,, nothing; rice, paddy, &c., $13,152; growing crops, $9,000; and live stock, $630. The assessor raised nearly all the valuations to a greater or less extent. The fee simple property was raised about fifty per cent. The taxpayer acquiesced in all the increased amounts except that of the leasehold interests, which the assesor placed at $19,621. As to that he appealed to the Tax…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henrique v. ParisHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re Assessment of Taxes, Estate of BishopHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chilton v. ShawHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. ShawHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. ShawHawaii Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilder v. ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Territory v. DuvauchelleHawaii Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API